r.setCurrensetCurrentSublistTexttLineItemValue({"sublistId":"item","fieldId":"serialnumbers","text":"TESTIB07-2"}); specifically, setCurrentsetCurrent
It's been a while since I've needed to review Celigo debug logs, so maybe this is a legitimate method name, but sure looks like a bug! I know the SuiteScript API has no such method, it's clearly setCurrentSublistText dropped into setCurrentLineItemValue
It would also possibly explain why my 2 line fulfillment is only logging details for 1 line (other than the initial fulfilled flag clearing.
OK, here's the the full logs:
04/29/2026 9:51:04 PM nlapi calls registered for $R r = NRecord.transform({"fromType":"salesorder","fromId":9030418,"toType":"itemfulfillment","defaultValues":{"recordmode":"dynamic"}});
r.selectLine({"sublistId":"item","line":0});
r.setCurrentSublistValue({"sublistId":"item","fieldId":"itemreceive","value":false});
r.selectLine({"sublistId":"item","line":1});
r.setCurrentSublistValue({"sublistId":"item","fieldId":"itemreceive","value":false});
r.selectLine({"sublistId":"item","line":0});
r.setCurrentSublistValue({"sublistId":"item","fieldId":"line","value":"1"});
r.setCurrentSublistValue({"sublistId":"item","fieldId":"quantity","value":50});
r.setCurrentSublistValue({"sublistId":"item","fieldId":"itemreceive","value":true});
r.setCurrensetCurrentSublistTexttLineItemValue({"sublistId":"item","fieldId":"serialnumbers","text":"TESTIB07-2"});
And the IIO error from the flow run:
Failed to create, update/transform record because null Possible reasons include > Something went wrong on NetSuite side. > You might have specified an invalid field value for a field. > You may have submitted an invalid record. Please consult NetSuite Support with NLAPI calls obtained from NetSuite Connection Debugger.
My question for Celigo: Is this just a logging bug that shows that nonexistent method name, or is there a more serious bug that is possibly also responsible for my Fulfillment failing to save?
In case anyone in Celigo wants to take a look, Flow ID: 69d755deb8bbb3c7a02047b1
Funny! Even this forum software disagrees with that method name!
